
Columbus, Ohio - September 20, 2004 - A plan that ALLTEL
and Western Reserve telephone companies are seeking to have approved by state
regulators could increase the rates of dozens of services and features at a
time when their residential customers have no choice of local telephone providers,
the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC), the residential utility
advocate, said today.
The OCC will oppose the plan in comments to be filed later today at the Public
Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) and will ask the PUCO to protect consumers’ rates.
“If the plan is allowed by the PUCO, residential customers of both ALLTEL
and Western Reserve could see significant price increases on commonly used
services while still having no choice of local telephone providers,” said
Janine Migden-Ostrander, Consumers’ Counsel.
“At a time when many residents are trying to stay within a budget, they
may be left to pay higher rates or forced to drop features altogether. This
is unfair.”
The plan would allow ALLTEL and Western Reserve telephone companies to operate
under "elective alternative regulation," which caps the price of
basic local service while giving the company the ability to raise the rates
of features like Call Waiting and Caller ID with Name. For example, these companies
could raise the prices of Three-Way Calling and Call Forwarding immediately
and without limit. After two years under the plan, ALLTEL and Western Reserve
could raise the price of Call Waiting by 10 percent per year until its price
reaches double what customers pay today.
Another local telephone company – Sprint – has used alternative
regulation to impose increases of as much as 60 percent on several services
and features since October 2002 when it began operating under the same plan.
ALLTEL and Western Reserve filed their requests for elective alternative regulation
with the PUCO on August 30. Unless the PUCO acts by October 15, the plan will
be approved automatically.
Elective alternative regulation allows local telephone companies to raise rates
for commonly used features without any review while agreeing to cap the rates
of basic local service and basic Caller ID. The OCC believes only companies
whose customers have local telephone choices should be eligible for elective
alternative regulation.
“Approval of this plan would leave consumers without the protection of
price increase reviews or the promise of lower rates that a competitive market
may be able to provide,” said Migden-Ostrander.
End of Page