
COLUMBUS, Ohio – September 19, 2006 – Ohio needs to plan for an affordable and environmentally sound energy future by designing and enacting a portfolio of diverse electricity options that will better serve residents and businesses over the long-term, the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC) announced today.
“This energy plan will help move Ohio forward to ensure that sufficient
and affordable
electricity supplies are available to residents and businesses, and help increase
our state’s energy independence,” said Janine Migden-Ostrander,
Consumers’ Counsel. “Rate plans previously enacted by state regulators
only serve as temporary measures. Ohioans deserve a comprehensive energy plan
for the future that will keep pace with forecasted growth in electric usage
while providing consumers with greater price certainty.”
Today, the OCC issued its Integrated Portfolio Management plan which, if implemented, would meet the following goals:
Based on the OCC’s plan, long-term forecast reports would be filed by the electric utilities estimating how much power would be needed for the next 20 years as well as a plan to meet that demand. These reports were produced by the utilities prior to Ohio’s 1999 electric choice law and this requirement would need to be reinstituted by the General Assembly.
With the forecast reports serving as a benchmark for short- and long-term demand needs for electricity, auctions would be conducted to meet a selected portfolio of supply and demand options. Suppliers could include independent power producers, generation affiliates of Ohio’s electric utilities and various providers of programs designed to reduce demand. Customers’ rates would be a blend of the various short- and long-term auction prices submitted by different suppliers.
“The plan we have introduced would bring diversity and long-term energy planning to Ohio,” Migden-Ostrander said. “Consumers would be protected from the rate shock that can occur when a utility’s electric generation is heavily dependent on one type of fuel or method of generating energy. Competitively bidding for power, encouraging the usage of renewable energy and reducing the demand for electricity through energy efficiency programs would benefit our state far into the future.”
Based on the forecast reports, if construction of a new power plant is needed, a utility’s plan could include the project and a competitive bid would determine the lowest cost builder. For example, if a forecast filed in 2009 showed that 600 megawatts of new electricity generation would be needed in 2015, a winning supplier would have six years to obtain financing and build the plant. The costs would be recovered through the sale of electricity once the plant began serving customers.
End of Page